Police: School Bus Driver Didn't Have Insurance
State police said the contracted school bus company didn't have insurance when its drivers made 160 bus runs for Chartiers Valley from December to April.
The owner of a company contracted to do substitute bus driving for Chartiers Valley School District faces numerous charges after state police said he didn’t have insurance while driving students for nearly five months.
Michael N. Krawec, 25, of Pittsburgh, did not have proper insurance when troopers say his company made 160 bus runs for Chartiers Valley from Dec. 7 to April 25.
According to a Pennsylvania State Police press release, an anonymous caller alerted troopers at the Moon Township barracks to the situation on April 9. Later that month, investigators went to the company’s bus depot in Baldwin and found an insurance card that was supposed to cover all Chartiers Valley buses that expired on Oct. 5.
Troopers said they later learned from the Chartiers Valley Transportation Department that Kraweck, who owns and operates Krawec Transit of Pittsburgh, made 160 runs after his insurance was canceled.
Although investigators said Krawec’s insurance expired in October, school officials said any students on those bus rides were still covered by the district’s liability insurance.
"All Chartiers Valley students were covered by the district's insurance during the time they were transported by (Krawec) Transit," school district spokeswoman Kara Droney said.
State police charged him with 160 counts of driving without required financial responsibility and one count each of records tampering, insurance fraud, false swearing and tampering with public records, among other charges. The charges were filed last week at the office of District Judge Maureen McGraw-Desmet.
Like the Chartiers Valley Patch Facebook page or sign up for our Daily E-mail Newsletter
trusgold
5:57 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
thank you Mike!!!!!!!!!!!!
amy haniford
9:01 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Way to go and no thanks to those who have even considered hiring an outside bus company. Are u ready to reconsider and give our current drivers the contract they deserve!!
Jaun
9:06 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
AND THE SCHOOL BOARD WANTS TO CONTRACT OUT ALL BUS RUNS TO SAVE A DOLLAR?
Lesley
10:36 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
This is a BIG reason why the school district should not contract our bus service. My step-son road one of their buses (7U) and he bus smelled horrible, the driver had a lead foot and he was caught by the kids texting while driving the bus!
Yes the district may have insurance but the primary responsibility is the bus company; the districts insurance is only meant to be secondary insurance. Luckily, no one was ever hurt on one of those buses because the district would be sued. Obviously no one was doing a periodic check to see if they had insurance coverage- were we even listed on their policy?? Keep digging Mike I am sure there is more to this story.
Michelle
2:18 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
Why wasn't he charged with child endangermant too??
Sherry
8:50 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
I agree with everyone here. Safety to save a buck...come on people. Keep the district drivers and other employees that we already have.....